2012年10月29日星期一

Healer analysis contains a prosperity of information about healing

If you've ever desired a close-up look at the mission's treatment zeitgeist, Skip Salud has it -- she lately turned on a survey/meme of healers around the WoW dunia ngeblog, and the existing e-mail deal with information are now in and published on her web page. They make for some interesting few days studying, especially if you're enthusiastic about treatment and what healers think of it.

I'm sure there's many results that could be attracted out of this (I'll let you all come up with some in content as well), but just studying through them on my own, it seems like there's a few discussions between them. Most of treatment seems to be done in 10-mans, which probably isn't too amazing, given that's where most of the endgame players are right now as well. There's no apparent champ on category or specifications (all four treatment sessions are exposed quite similarly, though I didn't really meltdown the numbers), though there are quite a few monks, and of those, factors seem to be divided between sacred and cd.

In conditions of a preferred miracle, there's almost no cross-over at all -- individuals are all over the position, from Shining example to Penance to Group of Healing. To concentrate on these people tell it, healers have all types of fun means to perform with. With regards to a weak point to treatment, two primary solutions appear: mana regrowth (always a problem with mana-heavy sessions like healers) and flexibility. Shamans and druids have issues with big rush treatment, and paladins say they need more group treatment durability, but almost everyone refers to either mana or activity. There's a lot more to look through, too, in conditions of how healers assess their performance and add-on recommendations from everyone. As a look within the healer "scene," there is a ton of information in there about what healers are up to out on the locations.

没有评论:

发表评论